We need your consent to display map services
We use Google Maps as third-party software in order to be able to present our locations to you here.
By clicking on "Accept" you agree to the data processing by Google.
Feel free to write us!
We are on site for you. Feel free to contact our consultants.
We use Google Maps as third-party software in order to be able to present our locations to you here.
By clicking on "Accept" you agree to the data processing by Google.
Learn more about us
Article by Simon Landt
Inheriting real estate brings more than just a land registry entry. It presents heirs with a far-reaching decision: Should the property remain in the family assets, perhaps as a source of ongoing rental income, be used personally, or is a sale advisable to free up capital and restructure the asset allocation?
In principle, real estate ownership fulfills two functions with regard to wealth accumulation. On the one hand, alongside traditional financial products such as stocks, bonds, and ETFs, it serves as a diversification component and, as a tangible asset, offers security. On the other hand, it provides an additional source of returns, for example, through ongoing rental income and capital appreciation. Including it in the asset allocation is therefore certainly sensible - but how much is "optimal"?